Skip to main content
How BRC-IOP certification impacts food-contact packaging safety

How BRC-IOP certification impacts food-contact packaging safety

Key Takeaways

BRC-IOP establishes hygiene management systems critical for food-contact materials. Miko Pac achieved BRC-IOP certification across both plants in 2008. Certification builds on ISO 9001 foundation started in 1994.

The management team mapped existing quality procedures against the new global packaging standards to identify hygiene-specific gaps before committing to a formal certification timeline. That gap analysis took roughly 4 to 6 weeks. The company has now maintained continuous certification for over 14 years.

The Challenge: Meeting Rising Food Safety Demands

Growing regulatory pressure on packaging manufacturers supplying FMCG brands created new expectations. Standard quality metrics no longer satisfied major clients who demanded proof of dedicated hygiene controls.

The compliance team reviewed recent audit feedback and found traceability requirements now extended to resin batches within a 2 to 4 hour recall window. Supplier audits also shifted from annual to bi-annual cycles. The transition from MPC-DG Plastics to Miko Pac made these updated standards unavoidable.

The Solution: Implementing BRC-IOP Alongside ISO 9001

Adoption of the BRC-IOP Global Standard for Packaging and Packaging Materials began in 2008. The team integrated it with the existing ISO 9001:2008 quality management system and added the ETI Base code for ethical supply chain practices.

The implementation committee considered building a standalone hygiene system first. A pilot review showed high redundancy with current procedures, so the group instead folded the new requirements into the ISO framework. The phased rollout lasted 7 to 9 months and incorporated over 40 distinct hygiene and ethical supply chain procedures.

Results: Measurable Improvements in Packaging Safety

Enhanced hygiene management now protects food-contact materials at every stage. External audits have confirmed compliance for major clients without interruption since 2008.

To validate the integrated system, the quality assurance department moved from reactive end-of-line inspections to proactive environmental swabbing and continuous monitoring. Based on these audit outcomes, the sites have achieved Grade A status across 3 consecutive external audit cycles. Client-initiated corrective action requests dropped from an average of 6 down to 1 or 2 per audit.

Image showing audit

Scope and Limitations of Certification Benefits

Certification applies specifically to packaging production processes. Ongoing maintenance requires regular audits and updates. It complements but does not replace brand-specific quality requirements.

During annual management reviews the compliance team noted that standardized certifications could not cover every bespoke client demand. They therefore created a supplementary database for tracking unique protocols, allocating about 12 to 15 hours per month to those updates.

Caveat: BRC-IOP certification validates the manufacturing environment and hygiene controls but does not inherently certify the chemical migration compliance of novel polymer blends, which still require independent laboratory testing.

Never Miss an Update

Join thousands of readers.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Your cookie choices